A jury of your peers simply refers to a jury pulled from members at large of the society in which you live. They do not have to have anything else in common with you.
That’s pretty funny, I like that. I can only imagine what the defense would say. Speaking of defense, I can’t imagine what kind of low life lawyer would EVER try and defend his butt!
So you think that robbers must be tried by a jury of robbers, and murderers must be tried by a jury of murderers? We rest our case that conservatives are not the sharpest crayons in the box.
Related islam posts:
- Where might we try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed if he demands trial by a jury of his peers? The Constitution guarantees that he is entitled to be attempted by a jury of his peers that can never be found in a United States...
- How can people believe a jury of New Yorkers will find Khalid Sheikh Mohammed innocent? Especially if he carries out his devise to diatribe about a attacks upon New York in court. ...
- Would you want to serve on the jury trying Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? For me a a indecisive point, since if we were as brief with contingent arch invulnerability profession Ramsey Clark during jury preference as we am...
- How do you think the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will turn out? ...
- Doesn’t your heart just bleed knowing that it took 8 years for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to get a trial? Don’t we only feel all comfortable as well as hairy meaningful which he is removing judged in the municipal justice instead of the troops tribunal?...
If you like this blog please take a second and subscribe to my rss feedComments: 15 comments
All the Islamic fields that are marked with REQ must be filled when searched for
Dan
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
No democrats will do fine. He is as good as judged Innocent. It’s Your fault He did it You rotten American.
Low life lawyer, American Criminal Liberties Union will be all over this and standing in line to defend Him.
℃ȁṛㅉḝň☂
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Maybe just people with bed head and chest hair.
thereligiousrightisneither
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
A jury of your peers simply refers to a jury pulled from members at large of the society in which you live. They do not have to have anything else in common with you.
rgcamire
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
That’s pretty funny, I like that. I can only imagine what the defense would say. Speaking of defense, I can’t imagine what kind of low life lawyer would EVER try and defend his butt!
Donkey Face Jackass
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Yes, Liberals have already decided to take their side.
chancealot
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Oh zing! You are correct. Where do you get folks that comprise a jury of his peers?
vwvw30
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Guess that means Obama and Eric Holder will be on the Jury!
myopinion
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Maybe Obama can get some of his man tsars to be the jury.. they certainly fit the bill!
my 10th account
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
dumb question, do alleged murderers only have murderers in the jury?? get some common sense next time
amazin'g
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
It’s as logical as giving this terrorist the presumption of innocence. It’s as logical as anything else this administration has done.
guru
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
I miss the klan. I never see the robes and hoods anymore.
good guy
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
silly you, the defendants peers will be picked from the mens room urinals….
iris054
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
So you think that robbers must be tried by a jury of robbers, and murderers must be tried by a jury of murderers? We rest our case that conservatives are not the sharpest crayons in the box.
Liberal AssKicker
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
There are only a few of those left, and they’re all on the faculty at Columbia.
Sky
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
If you consider New Yorkers…TERRORISTS…then sure!
Leave a reply